<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 26 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants, manufacturers of furniture seeking exemption under Notification 10/97-CE for supplying to specific institutions. The dispute revolved around whether the supplied furniture qualified as Accessories under the notification meant for Scientific and Technical Instruments. The Tribunal, after considering the ergonomic design of the furniture and its essential role in enhancing human well-being and system performance in a research environment, classified the supplied goods as Accessories to Scientific Equipments. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief from the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 26 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants, manufacturers of furniture seeking exemption under Notification 10/97-CE for supplying to specific institutions. The dispute revolved around whether the supplied furniture qualified as Accessories under the notification meant for Scientific and Technical Instruments. The Tribunal, after considering the ergonomic design of the furniture and its essential role in enhancing human well-being and system performance in a research environment, classified the supplied goods as Accessories to Scientific Equipments. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief from the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>