<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1337 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174772</link>
    <description>The court acknowledged the inordinate delay in filing the appeal but emphasized the need to protect the public exchequer. Citing precedents, the court held that the expression &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should be liberally construed to advance substantial justice. The delay was ultimately condoned on the condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 13,500/- to the respondents within ten days, failing which the petition would be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1337 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174772</link>
      <description>The court acknowledged the inordinate delay in filing the appeal but emphasized the need to protect the public exchequer. Citing precedents, the court held that the expression &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should be liberally construed to advance substantial justice. The delay was ultimately condoned on the condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 13,500/- to the respondents within ten days, failing which the petition would be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>