<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 142 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174768</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, finding that the High Court erred in dismissing the petition for condonation of delay. The appellant had sufficient cause for the delay, which was due to circumstances beyond their control. The Court directed the respondents to pay the costs of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the objections were deemed to have been filed within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 142 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174768</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, finding that the High Court erred in dismissing the petition for condonation of delay. The appellant had sufficient cause for the delay, which was due to circumstances beyond their control. The Court directed the respondents to pay the costs of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the objections were deemed to have been filed within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>