https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765 A revisional order capable of direct challenge was held not to be a nullity merely because jurisdiction was questioned later in collateral execution proceedings; a plea of jurisdictional defect first raised under writ jurisdiction could not be entertained, especially where special leave petitions had already been pursued against that order. On the alleged breach of an undertaking to provide alternative accommodation until reconstruction, the Court accepted concurrent findings that no vacant shop-room or comparable space was available with the landlord or his son for allotment to the tenants, and found no illegality or impropriety in those findings. The execution orders were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765 A revisional order capable of direct challenge was held not to be a nullity merely because jurisdiction was questioned later in collateral execution proceedings; a plea of jurisdictional defect first raised under writ jurisdiction could not be entertained, especially where special leave petitions had already been pursued against that order. On the alleged breach of an undertaking to provide alternative accommodation until reconstruction, the Court accepted concurrent findings that no vacant shop-room or comparable space was available with the landlord or his son for allotment to the tenants, and found no illegality or impropriety in those findings. The execution orders were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765