<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 511 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765</link>
    <description>The Original Petition challenging the High Court&#039;s eviction order and subsequent execution orders was dismissed. The court held that the jurisdiction issue not raised before the Supreme Court during Special Leave Petitions could not be raised collaterally under Article 226 and 227. It emphasized that an Article 226 petition cannot quash a court order, and jurisdiction pleas cannot be raised for the first time in such proceedings. The court found the execution proceedings valid, upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment as voidable, and rejected the petitioners&#039; arguments regarding compliance with submissions made before the Supreme Court. The Original Petition was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 511 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765</link>
      <description>The Original Petition challenging the High Court&#039;s eviction order and subsequent execution orders was dismissed. The court held that the jurisdiction issue not raised before the Supreme Court during Special Leave Petitions could not be raised collaterally under Article 226 and 227. It emphasized that an Article 226 petition cannot quash a court order, and jurisdiction pleas cannot be raised for the first time in such proceedings. The court found the execution proceedings valid, upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment as voidable, and rejected the petitioners&#039; arguments regarding compliance with submissions made before the Supreme Court. The Original Petition was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>