<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 444 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174758</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, affirming the trial Court&#039;s order and final decree. The Court directed the respondents to pay Rs. 20,000 to the appellant as owelty, ensuring an equitable distribution of the properties. Both parties were ordered to bear their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 444 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174758</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, affirming the trial Court&#039;s order and final decree. The Court directed the respondents to pay Rs. 20,000 to the appellant as owelty, ensuring an equitable distribution of the properties. Both parties were ordered to bear their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>