<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (3) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174753</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, reversing the High Court&#039;s orders and dismissing the Official Receiver&#039;s restitution claims. The Court held that the provision for owelty in the partition decree created a lien by necessary implication, securing the sixth defendant&#039;s entitlement to the amounts awarded. The Official Receiver was directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (3) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174753</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, reversing the High Court&#039;s orders and dismissing the Official Receiver&#039;s restitution claims. The Court held that the provision for owelty in the partition decree created a lien by necessary implication, securing the sixth defendant&#039;s entitlement to the amounts awarded. The Official Receiver was directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>