<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 43 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 14/2002 was available where the substantive conditions were satisfied, including non-availment of Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods and payment of duty on yarn. The record accepted the practical difficulty of paying duty at the spindle stage for grey fabrics cleared for both export and domestic use, and treated payment at the fabrics stage under the trade notice as consistent with the governing scheme. Reversal of Cenvat credit was treated as equivalent to non-availment of credit. On that basis, the exemption was upheld and the differential duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 43 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 14/2002 was available where the substantive conditions were satisfied, including non-availment of Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods and payment of duty on yarn. The record accepted the practical difficulty of paying duty at the spindle stage for grey fabrics cleared for both export and domestic use, and treated payment at the fabrics stage under the trade notice as consistent with the governing scheme. Reversal of Cenvat credit was treated as equivalent to non-availment of credit. On that basis, the exemption was upheld and the differential duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>