https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266303 The case involves a dispute over the demand for interest on Service Tax liability post-1-5-2006, which the petitioner had already paid. The respondent relied on CESTAT Mumbai and Delhi judgments regarding Service Tax liability, highlighting the lack of clarity on liability post that date. Communication between the Indian Banks' Association and the Service Tax department underscored the need for clarification. Despite the acquiring bank paying the tax, the demand was made against the issuing bank, raising questions on liability post-payment. The court sought clarification on decisions by C.B.E. & C. and the meeting between the parties, leading to an adjournment for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:29:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266303 The case involves a dispute over the demand for interest on Service Tax liability post-1-5-2006, which the petitioner had already paid. The respondent relied on CESTAT Mumbai and Delhi judgments regarding Service Tax liability, highlighting the lack of clarity on liability post that date. Communication between the Indian Banks' Association and the Service Tax department underscored the need for clarification. Despite the acquiring bank paying the tax, the demand was made against the issuing bank, raising questions on liability post-payment. The court sought clarification on decisions by C.B.E. & C. and the meeting between the parties, leading to an adjournment for further proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266303