<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1577 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit on construction services used for setting up their factory. The Tribunal emphasized that manufacturers are entitled to claim such credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, highlighting the importance of aligning the interpretation of rules with the actual utilization of services in the manufacturing process. The appeal lacked merit, and the decision granting Cenvat credit for construction services was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1577 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit on construction services used for setting up their factory. The Tribunal emphasized that manufacturers are entitled to claim such credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, highlighting the importance of aligning the interpretation of rules with the actual utilization of services in the manufacturing process. The appeal lacked merit, and the decision granting Cenvat credit for construction services was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>