<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming the duty demand on CENVAT credit of service tax paid on Sales Commission, as it exceeded the show cause notice&#039;s scope. The order was annulled due to inconsistencies between the notice and findings, leading to a remand for a fresh decision on the eligibility of CENVAT credit. The matter was sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a proper hearing and reconsideration, ensuring a fair review of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming the duty demand on CENVAT credit of service tax paid on Sales Commission, as it exceeded the show cause notice&#039;s scope. The order was annulled due to inconsistencies between the notice and findings, leading to a remand for a fresh decision on the eligibility of CENVAT credit. The matter was sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a proper hearing and reconsideration, ensuring a fair review of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>