<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1568 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, classifying Neelibhringadi Thailam (Coconut Oil base and Gingelly Oil base), Sugandham Thailam, and Danta Dhavana Churnam as Ayurvedic medicaments under sub-heading No. 3003.39. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention that the products were cosmetics, emphasizing their therapeutic properties, manufacturing process according to Ayurvedic texts, and recognition as medicaments by doctors and users.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1568 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, classifying Neelibhringadi Thailam (Coconut Oil base and Gingelly Oil base), Sugandham Thailam, and Danta Dhavana Churnam as Ayurvedic medicaments under sub-heading No. 3003.39. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention that the products were cosmetics, emphasizing their therapeutic properties, manufacturing process according to Ayurvedic texts, and recognition as medicaments by doctors and users.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>