https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266289 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer, regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on various input services. It allowed the credit for services utilized in the manufacturing process, including erection, installation, commissioning services, GTA, telephone services, and job work. The Tribunal differentiated between pre and post-2008 rules on outward transportation credit, ultimately permitting the credit based on judicial precedents. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of credit on the basis of inadequate documentation, as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the credit. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266289 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer, regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on various input services. It allowed the credit for services utilized in the manufacturing process, including erection, installation, commissioning services, GTA, telephone services, and job work. The Tribunal differentiated between pre and post-2008 rules on outward transportation credit, ultimately permitting the credit based on judicial precedents. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of credit on the basis of inadequate documentation, as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266289