https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266276 The Tribunal set aside the demand on duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine clearance of goods due to discrepancies in stock and lack of evidence. The appellant successfully challenged the allegations by pointing out investigative flaws and the absence of reliable evidence, leading to the conclusion that the Revenue's case was weak and unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned based on the lack of substantial evidence supporting the duty demand. en-us Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266276 The Tribunal set aside the demand on duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine clearance of goods due to discrepancies in stock and lack of evidence. The appellant successfully challenged the allegations by pointing out investigative flaws and the absence of reliable evidence, leading to the conclusion that the Revenue's case was weak and unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned based on the lack of substantial evidence supporting the duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266276