<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1550 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266275</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged an Order-in-Original denying exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE for labels manufactured bearing a customer&#039;s brand name. The Tribunal concluded that the stickers manufactured qualified for exemption under the amended Notification, emphasizing the intention to benefit specified goods like packing materials. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s distinction between stickers and labels, holding that the appellant&#039;s labels were eligible for exemption. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unnecessary, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1550 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266275</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged an Order-in-Original denying exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE for labels manufactured bearing a customer&#039;s brand name. The Tribunal concluded that the stickers manufactured qualified for exemption under the amended Notification, emphasizing the intention to benefit specified goods like packing materials. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s distinction between stickers and labels, holding that the appellant&#039;s labels were eligible for exemption. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unnecessary, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>