<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1541 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification of the revised balance sheets to ascertain the legitimacy of the refund claim. If found accurate and showing the refund amount as receivable, the refund can be sanctioned. The original adjudicating authority was directed to complete reassessment within three months, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing and submission of necessary documents. The appeal was disposed of through remand for further evaluation based on the revised balance sheet evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1541 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification of the revised balance sheets to ascertain the legitimacy of the refund claim. If found accurate and showing the refund amount as receivable, the refund can be sanctioned. The original adjudicating authority was directed to complete reassessment within three months, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing and submission of necessary documents. The appeal was disposed of through remand for further evaluation based on the revised balance sheet evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>