https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266254 The court rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the insufficient and vague explanation provided by the counsel on behalf of the appellant regarding the 661-day delay in filing the appeal. The court emphasized the necessity of a detailed and specific explanation for significant delays in legal proceedings, noting the lack of specific details regarding the appellant's travel dates and daughter's wedding as reasons for the rejection. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266254 The court rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the insufficient and vague explanation provided by the counsel on behalf of the appellant regarding the 661-day delay in filing the appeal. The court emphasized the necessity of a detailed and specific explanation for significant delays in legal proceedings, noting the lack of specific details regarding the appellant's travel dates and daughter's wedding as reasons for the rejection. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266254