<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1526 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The authority was instructed to allow cross-examination of the processors, consider the formula presented by the appellant&#039;s advocate, and ensure proper opportunity for hearing before passing any new orders. The Tribunal clarified that the decision was made without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, allowing both appeals by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:06:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1526 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The authority was instructed to allow cross-examination of the processors, consider the formula presented by the appellant&#039;s advocate, and ensure proper opportunity for hearing before passing any new orders. The Tribunal clarified that the decision was made without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, allowing both appeals by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>