<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 28 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim for sub-standard goods supplied to railways. The rejection was based on the grounds that the sale was affected at a higher price, despite the goods being sub-standard. The Tribunal held that the contracted price was for goods meeting a specific standard, and as the quality did not meet that standard, the higher price was not applicable. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the refund, setting aside the initial rejection and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 28 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim for sub-standard goods supplied to railways. The rejection was based on the grounds that the sale was affected at a higher price, despite the goods being sub-standard. The Tribunal held that the contracted price was for goods meeting a specific standard, and as the quality did not meet that standard, the higher price was not applicable. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the refund, setting aside the initial rejection and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>