https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782 The Tribunal held that the sub-consultant is not required to pay service tax if the main consultant has already done so, as per the Board's Circular and Trade Notices. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in disregarding these clarifications and directed a fresh assessment to verify the main consultant's payment of service tax. The case was remanded for re-adjudication within four months, emphasizing adherence to principles of 'Natural Justice'. en-us Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782 The Tribunal held that the sub-consultant is not required to pay service tax if the main consultant has already done so, as per the Board's Circular and Trade Notices. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in disregarding these clarifications and directed a fresh assessment to verify the main consultant's payment of service tax. The case was remanded for re-adjudication within four months, emphasizing adherence to principles of 'Natural Justice'. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782