<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1473 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266198</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the Ld. CIT(A) based on the quantum additions sustained and modified during the assessment proceedings. The ITAT found that the penalty does not survive when the quantum additions are deleted or set aside. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, deciding the issue against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1473 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266198</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the Ld. CIT(A) based on the quantum additions sustained and modified during the assessment proceedings. The ITAT found that the penalty does not survive when the quantum additions are deleted or set aside. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, deciding the issue against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>