<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1456 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the cancellation of registration under section 12AA(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on non-filing of return. The decision was made due to the lack of specific grounds for cancellation related to non-filing of return under the mentioned section. The Tribunal emphasized the literal interpretation of tax statutes and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s order passed ex parte, highlighting the absence of supporting case law for the broad interpretation of section 12AA(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1456 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the cancellation of registration under section 12AA(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on non-filing of return. The decision was made due to the lack of specific grounds for cancellation related to non-filing of return under the mentioned section. The Tribunal emphasized the literal interpretation of tax statutes and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s order passed ex parte, highlighting the absence of supporting case law for the broad interpretation of section 12AA(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>