<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 26,72,955 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that when the agent complies with TDS obligations, no disallowance can be made under section 40(a)(ia) for reimbursement of expenses. The decision was influenced by a relevant High Court case and the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition by the Supreme Court in a similar matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 26,72,955 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that when the agent complies with TDS obligations, no disallowance can be made under section 40(a)(ia) for reimbursement of expenses. The decision was influenced by a relevant High Court case and the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition by the Supreme Court in a similar matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>