<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1442 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case concerning the assessment year 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to recalculate depreciation based on the written down value from the 2009-10 assessment. The appeal by Revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, pending further assessment adjustments. The decision emphasizes aligning cost valuation with relevant assessment years and considering pending appellate decisions for accurate tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:43:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1442 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case concerning the assessment year 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to recalculate depreciation based on the written down value from the 2009-10 assessment. The appeal by Revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, pending further assessment adjustments. The decision emphasizes aligning cost valuation with relevant assessment years and considering pending appellate decisions for accurate tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>