<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1432 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266157</link>
    <description>The Assessee appealed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) for A.Y 2009-10, challenging additions made in the assessment due to the seizure of accounting documents. The Tribunal remanded all issues to the AO for re-adjudication, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s right to provide detailed explanations in light of the seized documents. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, granting the Assessee a fair opportunity to support its contentions before the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1432 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266157</link>
      <description>The Assessee appealed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) for A.Y 2009-10, challenging additions made in the assessment due to the seizure of accounting documents. The Tribunal remanded all issues to the AO for re-adjudication, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s right to provide detailed explanations in light of the seized documents. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, granting the Assessee a fair opportunity to support its contentions before the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>