<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266146</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the claim under section 54F was debatable and that providing all necessary details, even if the claim was unsuccessful, did not constitute a false claim warranting a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266146</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the claim under section 54F was debatable and that providing all necessary details, even if the claim was unsuccessful, did not constitute a false claim warranting a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>