https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773 The court upheld the liability of the petitioner for service tax as an outdoor caterer supplying food and beverages to air companies for inflight services. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments against the levy of service tax, clarified legal definitions, and highlighted the absence of grounds for challenging the constitutional validity of the tax. The court also addressed potential double taxation and exemption provisions, ultimately dismissing the petitioner's claims due to lack of merit. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773 The court upheld the liability of the petitioner for service tax as an outdoor caterer supplying food and beverages to air companies for inflight services. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments against the levy of service tax, clarified legal definitions, and highlighted the absence of grounds for challenging the constitutional validity of the tax. The court also addressed potential double taxation and exemption provisions, ultimately dismissing the petitioner's claims due to lack of merit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773