<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1397 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowability of the cost of the abandoned film as revenue expenditure, supporting the appellant&#039;s treatment of film production as stock-in-trade. The Tribunal referenced judicial decisions, including those from the Bombay High Court, to justify the deduction of the expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the consistent application of relevant judicial precedents in determining revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1397 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowability of the cost of the abandoned film as revenue expenditure, supporting the appellant&#039;s treatment of film production as stock-in-trade. The Tribunal referenced judicial decisions, including those from the Bombay High Court, to justify the deduction of the expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the consistent application of relevant judicial precedents in determining revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>