<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266119</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, granting the benefit of deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal considered the substantial rights acquired by the assessee in the flat for residential purposes, emphasizing the need for a liberal interpretation of the provision. Observing the control and rights similar to ownership held by the assessee over the property, the tribunal concluded that she was entitled to the exemption from capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266119</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, granting the benefit of deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal considered the substantial rights acquired by the assessee in the flat for residential purposes, emphasizing the need for a liberal interpretation of the provision. Observing the control and rights similar to ownership held by the assessee over the property, the tribunal concluded that she was entitled to the exemption from capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>