<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Department&#039;s re-calculation of duty on end cuttings of pipes, denial of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes for repair, and rejection of credit on CI Slag pots were unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deeming the Cenvat credit demands baseless and unsustainable, ultimately setting aside the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Department&#039;s re-calculation of duty on end cuttings of pipes, denial of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes for repair, and rejection of credit on CI Slag pots were unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deeming the Cenvat credit demands baseless and unsustainable, ultimately setting aside the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>