<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1368 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266093</link>
    <description>The CESTAT, Mumbai remanded a case involving a refund claim of duty paid on sizing of yarn used in manufacturing exported fabric back to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration based on new evidence. The Tribunal ruled that unjust enrichment does not apply to duty paid on materials used in manufacturing exported goods, allowing the appeal and granting relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1368 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266093</link>
      <description>The CESTAT, Mumbai remanded a case involving a refund claim of duty paid on sizing of yarn used in manufacturing exported fabric back to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration based on new evidence. The Tribunal ruled that unjust enrichment does not apply to duty paid on materials used in manufacturing exported goods, allowing the appeal and granting relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>