<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266092</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in machinery repair and maintenance. Relying on the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case and Supreme Court affirmation, the tribunal concluded that the credit is permissible if the electrodes are utilized for repair purposes. The tribunal dismissed conflicting judgments cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the precedence set by the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266092</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in machinery repair and maintenance. Relying on the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case and Supreme Court affirmation, the tribunal concluded that the credit is permissible if the electrodes are utilized for repair purposes. The tribunal dismissed conflicting judgments cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the precedence set by the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>