<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1362 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to Cenvat Credit on floor sweepings lost during the manufacturing process, based on the case law and precedents analyzed. The Tribunal found that the provisions of Rule 3(5)(c) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 were not applicable in this scenario, affirming the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1362 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to Cenvat Credit on floor sweepings lost during the manufacturing process, based on the case law and precedents analyzed. The Tribunal found that the provisions of Rule 3(5)(c) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 were not applicable in this scenario, affirming the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>