<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266086</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the time-barred demand and penalty imposition on M/s Mahalaxmi Fabrics Mills Ltd was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, confirming that the demands were not time-barred due to provisional costing practices. Additionally, M/s Mahalaxmi Fabrics Mills Ltd&#039;s argument regarding related party status was rejected, and the demands of &amp;amp;8377;20,528.00 and &amp;amp;8377;919.00 were upheld based on the established mutuality of interest between the parties. Both appeals were dismissed, affirming the original decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266086</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the time-barred demand and penalty imposition on M/s Mahalaxmi Fabrics Mills Ltd was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, confirming that the demands were not time-barred due to provisional costing practices. Additionally, M/s Mahalaxmi Fabrics Mills Ltd&#039;s argument regarding related party status was rejected, and the demands of &amp;amp;8377;20,528.00 and &amp;amp;8377;919.00 were upheld based on the established mutuality of interest between the parties. Both appeals were dismissed, affirming the original decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>