<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, confirming duty payment with interest but setting aside the penalties imposed. The decision was based on the lack of malicious intent in using the third-party brand name and the unique circumstances of the case. The appeals were disposed of, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, confirming duty payment with interest but setting aside the penalties imposed. The decision was based on the lack of malicious intent in using the third-party brand name and the unique circumstances of the case. The appeals were disposed of, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>