<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1345 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266070</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on input service invoices issued by a registered office as input service distributor was disputed because the adjudicating authority found that the invoices did not include all particulars of the underlying services received. The appellant stated that the supporting invoices were voluminous and could be produced before the authority. As the dispute depended on verification of the underlying documents, fresh examination of the evidence was required to determine eligibility for credit for the relevant period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration of the supporting documents and CENVAT credit entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1345 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266070</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on input service invoices issued by a registered office as input service distributor was disputed because the adjudicating authority found that the invoices did not include all particulars of the underlying services received. The appellant stated that the supporting invoices were voluminous and could be produced before the authority. As the dispute depended on verification of the underlying documents, fresh examination of the evidence was required to determine eligibility for credit for the relevant period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration of the supporting documents and CENVAT credit entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>