<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1340 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266065</link>
    <description>The appellant appealed the rejection of their refund claim for unjust enrichment after supplying printed sheets at a higher excise duty rate to their sister unit. Despite the initial denial, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant as the excess duty was later reversed by the sister unit, demonstrating no unjust enrichment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1340 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266065</link>
      <description>The appellant appealed the rejection of their refund claim for unjust enrichment after supplying printed sheets at a higher excise duty rate to their sister unit. Despite the initial denial, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant as the excess duty was later reversed by the sister unit, demonstrating no unjust enrichment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>