https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266062 Delay in payment of monthly duty under Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, where duty was paid from the CENVAT account during the default period, was treated as requiring reconsideration in light of the cited High Court decision. The Tribunal noted that the issue was prima facie covered by that decision and that the Commissioner (Appeals) should reassess the stay petitions rather than proceed on the existing dismissal for non-compliance. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after considering the High Court ruling. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266062 Delay in payment of monthly duty under Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, where duty was paid from the CENVAT account during the default period, was treated as requiring reconsideration in light of the cited High Court decision. The Tribunal noted that the issue was prima facie covered by that decision and that the Commissioner (Appeals) should reassess the stay petitions rather than proceed on the existing dismissal for non-compliance. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after considering the High Court ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266062