https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266059 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not justified. It was determined that the appellant had no knowledge of the clandestine activities of the manufacturer to whom they supplied raw materials. The Tribunal referred to relevant case law and concluded that the appellant should not be penalized for the manufacturer's illegal actions. As a result, the appeal was granted, and consequential relief was provided to the appellant. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:22:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266059 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not justified. It was determined that the appellant had no knowledge of the clandestine activities of the manufacturer to whom they supplied raw materials. The Tribunal referred to relevant case law and concluded that the appellant should not be penalized for the manufacturer's illegal actions. As a result, the appeal was granted, and consequential relief was provided to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266059