https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266057 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal solely regarding the refund of the redemption fine amount, granting consequential relief. The rejection of the refund claim based on time bar and non-submission of documents was upheld, as the appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim. The denial of the adjournment request was justified due to prior similar requests, and the failure to establish non-taking of CENVAT credit led to the appeal's rejection. The Tribunal deemed the redemption fine outside the scope of Section 11B, allowing the refund without time bar constraints. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266057 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal solely regarding the refund of the redemption fine amount, granting consequential relief. The rejection of the refund claim based on time bar and non-submission of documents was upheld, as the appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim. The denial of the adjournment request was justified due to prior similar requests, and the failure to establish non-taking of CENVAT credit led to the appeal's rejection. The Tribunal deemed the redemption fine outside the scope of Section 11B, allowing the refund without time bar constraints. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266057