<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1329 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266054</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, recognizing the business necessity of utilizing bank guarantees and emphasizing the importance of verifying the service tax amount with the banker before disallowing CENVAT credit for service charges incurred by a guarantor. The judgment highlighted the essential role of banking services in business operations and concluded by allowing the appeal while disposing of the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1329 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266054</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, recognizing the business necessity of utilizing bank guarantees and emphasizing the importance of verifying the service tax amount with the banker before disallowing CENVAT credit for service charges incurred by a guarantor. The judgment highlighted the essential role of banking services in business operations and concluded by allowing the appeal while disposing of the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>