https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266053 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, following the appellant's challenge against rejection based on unjust enrichment grounds. The judge, relying on legal precedents including a Larger Bench judgment, agreed that the refund in question was not subject to unjust enrichment. Considering the arguments and case laws presented, the judge granted consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing the importance of established legal principles and precedents in such cases. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:15:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266053 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, following the appellant's challenge against rejection based on unjust enrichment grounds. The judge, relying on legal precedents including a Larger Bench judgment, agreed that the refund in question was not subject to unjust enrichment. Considering the arguments and case laws presented, the judge granted consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing the importance of established legal principles and precedents in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266053