https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266044 The Tribunal remanded the matter to determine if the appellant needed to make any pre-deposit, considering a similar case where a portion of Rule 8(3A) was struck down by the High Court. Both orders-in-appeal were set aside, and the matters were sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh hearing without requiring a pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized giving the appellant a fair opportunity to present their case, leading to the disposal of miscellaneous applications, stay applications, and appeals without any pre-deposit requirement. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266044 The Tribunal remanded the matter to determine if the appellant needed to make any pre-deposit, considering a similar case where a portion of Rule 8(3A) was struck down by the High Court. Both orders-in-appeal were set aside, and the matters were sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh hearing without requiring a pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized giving the appellant a fair opportunity to present their case, leading to the disposal of miscellaneous applications, stay applications, and appeals without any pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266044