https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266040 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating authority for fresh decision. The denial of CENVAT Credit on M.S. Angles, Channels, Plates was set aside due to contradictions in the appellant's submissions regarding the use of the items for erection and commissioning versus construction purposes. The Tribunal granted the appellant an opportunity to provide supporting documents to clarify the use of the items, directing the Adjudicating authority to decide the case on merit and the limitation issue in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:22:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266040 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating authority for fresh decision. The denial of CENVAT Credit on M.S. Angles, Channels, Plates was set aside due to contradictions in the appellant's submissions regarding the use of the items for erection and commissioning versus construction purposes. The Tribunal granted the appellant an opportunity to provide supporting documents to clarify the use of the items, directing the Adjudicating authority to decide the case on merit and the limitation issue in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266040