<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay establishment charges as no departmental officer was posted at their unit for supervision, in line with previous decisions. The judgment favored the appellant, setting aside the demand for establishment charges of Rs. 13,19,539 and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay establishment charges as no departmental officer was posted at their unit for supervision, in line with previous decisions. The judgment favored the appellant, setting aside the demand for establishment charges of Rs. 13,19,539 and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>