<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174743</link>
    <description>Service tax was held not leviable on the surplus retained by a custodian after auction of unclaimed or abandoned imported cargo, because the amount was not consideration for Storage and Warehousing Service and the issue was already covered by prior tribunal decisions and Board Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU. On that settled basis, the demand failed, and the connected penalty could not survive once the tax demand itself was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174743</link>
      <description>Service tax was held not leviable on the surplus retained by a custodian after auction of unclaimed or abandoned imported cargo, because the amount was not consideration for Storage and Warehousing Service and the issue was already covered by prior tribunal decisions and Board Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU. On that settled basis, the demand failed, and the connected penalty could not survive once the tax demand itself was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>