<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 51 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G and Rule 57G(2A) of the Central Excise Rules was not to be denied merely because the duplicate invoice copy was unavailable. Where the invoice was duty-paid, the receipt of goods was undisputed, and the inputs were used in manufacture of final products, the substantive conditions of the credit scheme were treated as satisfied. On that basis, credit on the original invoice was allowable and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 51 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G and Rule 57G(2A) of the Central Excise Rules was not to be denied merely because the duplicate invoice copy was unavailable. Where the invoice was duty-paid, the receipt of goods was undisputed, and the inputs were used in manufacture of final products, the substantive conditions of the credit scheme were treated as satisfied. On that basis, credit on the original invoice was allowable and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>