<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1305 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the show cause notice to be not maintainable due to incorrect premises and deficiencies. The invocation of Sections 72 and 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 simultaneously was deemed impermissible, rendering the notice bad in law. Additionally, the adjudicating authority&#039;s findings beyond the original allegations and the lack of specificity in information requests were noted. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1305 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the show cause notice to be not maintainable due to incorrect premises and deficiencies. The invocation of Sections 72 and 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 simultaneously was deemed impermissible, rendering the notice bad in law. Additionally, the adjudicating authority&#039;s findings beyond the original allegations and the lack of specificity in information requests were noted. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>