<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266026</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s order and granting the appellant Cenvat credit for outdoor canteen services. The Court emphasized adherence to established legal precedents in tax matters and set aside the order denying the credit, citing a Larger Bench decision supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The respondent was given the opportunity to address the identified difference in a new proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 08:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266026</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s order and granting the appellant Cenvat credit for outdoor canteen services. The Court emphasized adherence to established legal precedents in tax matters and set aside the order denying the credit, citing a Larger Bench decision supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The respondent was given the opportunity to address the identified difference in a new proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>