<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1294 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266019</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the excise duty amount within 45 days, instructing CESTAT not to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance but to decide on the merits. The decision balanced the interests of the appellant and the Department, ensuring fair consideration without prejudice. By upholding legal requirements and prior judgments, the court aimed to maintain justice and equity in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1294 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266019</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the excise duty amount within 45 days, instructing CESTAT not to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance but to decide on the merits. The decision balanced the interests of the appellant and the Department, ensuring fair consideration without prejudice. By upholding legal requirements and prior judgments, the court aimed to maintain justice and equity in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>