https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266016 The tribunal upheld the department's case of clandestine clearance of HDPE woven sacks/bags by the appellant. The appellant was held liable for Central Excise duty and interest, except for the production in November 2003 due to the limitation period. A penalty equivalent to the confirmed duty was imposed, which could be reduced to 25% if paid promptly. The appellant's argument regarding job work was not substantiated, and the tribunal found the private register sufficient to establish the case without the need for additional corroborative evidence. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 08:17:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266016 The tribunal upheld the department's case of clandestine clearance of HDPE woven sacks/bags by the appellant. The appellant was held liable for Central Excise duty and interest, except for the production in November 2003 due to the limitation period. A penalty equivalent to the confirmed duty was imposed, which could be reduced to 25% if paid promptly. The appellant's argument regarding job work was not substantiated, and the tribunal found the private register sufficient to establish the case without the need for additional corroborative evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266016